JUNM vs. AAA

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JUNM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June) and AAA (AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JUNM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while AAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Alternative Access Funds LLC. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JUNM returned 7.59% vs 4.95% for AAA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JUNM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AAA.

Performance

JUNM vs. AAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June (JUNM) and AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNM achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than AAA's 1.78% return.

JUNM

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 7.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 6.47%
• 5Y*: 4.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNM vs. AAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JUNM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June	2.24%	7.85%	4.02%
AAA AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF	1.78%	4.92%	3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNM and AAA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.11

Return for Risk

JUNM vs. AAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNM

JUNM Risk / Return Rank: 96
JUNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
JUNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
JUNM Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JUNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
JUNM Martin Ratio Rank: 97

AAA

AAA Risk / Return Rank: 83
AAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
AAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AAA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AAA Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNM vs. AAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June (JUNM) and AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUNM	AAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.70	2.16	+1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.49	3.68	+2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.93	1.42	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.93	8.24	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.94	25.39	+17.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JUNM vs. AAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNM Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is higher than the AAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNM and AAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUNM	AAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70	2.16	+1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	1.92	-0.23

Drawdowns

JUNM vs. AAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNM drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, which is greater than AAA's maximum drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNM and AAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNM	AAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-2.63%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.10%	-0.60%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.30%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-0.30%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	0.20%	-0.02%

Volatility

JUNM vs. AAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June (JUNM) is 0.16%, while AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) has a volatility of 0.74%. This indicates that JUNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUNM	AAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.16%	0.74%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.40%	1.77%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08%	2.30%	-0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.34%	2.28%	+2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.34%	2.15%	+2.19%

JUNM vs. AAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AAA's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUNM vs. AAA - Dividend Comparison

JUNM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AAA AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF	4.91%	5.11%	6.17%	6.11%	2.78%	1.06%	0.32%
JUNM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUNM and AAA in my portfolio?

JUNM and AAA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JUNM or AAA?

AAA has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to JUNM (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNM dropped -5.42% vs AAA's -2.63%.

Which ETF is better, JUNM or AAA?

On 1-year performance, JUNM leads with 7.59% vs 4.95% for AAA. On fees, AAA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JUNM has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JUNM or AAA?

Over the 1-year period, JUNM has performed better with a 7.59% return vs 4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUNM or AAA?

AAA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JUNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUNM or AAA?

AAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for JUNM.

What is the main difference between JUNM and AAA?

JUNM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Alternative Access Funds LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JUNM and 0.25% for AAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JUNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.