JULZ vs. OILK
JULZ (Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JULZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JULZ returned 11.28%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JULZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
JULZ vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
JULZ
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
JULZ vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF | 8.79% | 13.23% | 18.76% | 17.65% | -9.34% | 20.66% | 16.20% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | 16.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JULZ and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.12 |
The correlation between JULZ and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULZ vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
JULZ
OILK
JULZ vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JULZ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.42 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 6.91 | +4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULZ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.06 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.59 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.12 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
JULZ vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULZ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -83.76% | +69.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -17.35% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.71% | -23.42% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.71% | -34.69% | +19.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -3.66% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -32.61% | +29.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 8.56% | -6.61% |
Volatility
JULZ vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) is 2.61%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that JULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULZ | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 10.44% | -7.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 23.26% | -15.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.25% | 28.75% | -18.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 30.12% | -17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.32% | 35.97% | -23.65% |
JULZ vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
JULZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
JULZ vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.00%, more than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF | 11.00% | 11.96% | 3.30% | 3.59% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JULZ and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to JULZ (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULZ dropped -14.71% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 11.28% for JULZ. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, JULZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULZ.
JULZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.00%, compared with 8.18% for OILK.
JULZ is categorized as Options Trading, while OILK is Oil & Gas. JULZ tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULZ and 0.68% for OILK.
JULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JULZ and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer