JULZ vs. LAPR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR).

JULZ and LAPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JULZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. LAPR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024.

Performance

JULZ vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JULZ vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	-4.68%	13.23%	9.84%
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	0.84%	5.81%	4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than LAPR's 0.84% return.

JULZ

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -4.57%
• YTD: -4.68%
• 6M: -3.09%
• 1Y: 11.99%
• 3Y*: 12.93%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

LAPR

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 5.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULZ vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JULZ and LAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

JULZ

Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF

LAPR

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April

Return for Risk

JULZ vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

LAPR

LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 77
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULZ vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JULZ	LAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.28	-0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	1.92	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.55	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	1.48	-0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	10.62	-5.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JULZ vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULZ and LAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULZ	LAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.28	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	1.71	-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between JULZ and LAPR is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

JULZ vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than LAPR's 5.36% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	12.55%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	5.36%	5.40%	4.21%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JULZ vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and LAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULZ	LAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.71%	-3.81%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-3.81%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.46%	0.00%	-6.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-0.12%	-2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	0.53%	+1.67%

Volatility

JULZ vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.10%. This indicates that JULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULZ	LAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	0.10%	+4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	0.68%	+7.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	4.40%	+9.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.18%	3.39%	+8.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.36%	3.39%	+8.97%