JULZ vs. ISWN
Compare and contrast key facts about Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN).
JULZ and ISWN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JULZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. ISWN is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the S-Network International BlackSwan. It was launched on Jan 25, 2021. Both JULZ and ISWN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JULZ vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JULZ vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF | -4.68% | 13.23% | 18.76% | 17.65% | -9.34% | 18.23% |
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 0.94% | 23.23% | -3.96% | 8.19% | -24.93% | 0.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.
JULZ
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- 1Y
- 11.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
ISWN
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.58%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JULZ vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JULZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JULZ vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank
JULZ
ISWN
JULZ vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JULZ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.35 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.86 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.61 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 6.68 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULZ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.35 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | -0.00 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | -0.04 | +1.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between JULZ and ISWN is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JULZ vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison
JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than ISWN's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF | 12.55% | 11.96% | 3.30% | 3.59% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 2.91% | 2.89% | 3.27% | 2.91% | 2.00% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
JULZ vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and ISWN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULZ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.71% | -32.35% | +17.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -9.63% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.71% | -32.35% | +17.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -7.11% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -16.57% | +13.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.32% | -0.12% |
Volatility
JULZ vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) is 4.42%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that JULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JULZ | ISWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 6.13% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 8.60% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 11.81% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.18% | 11.47% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 11.40% | +0.96% |