JULZ vs. CAOS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS).

JULZ and CAOS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JULZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. CAOS is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Aug 14, 2013.

Performance

JULZ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JULZ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	-4.68%	13.23%	18.76%	13.46%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	1.10%	2.55%	5.33%	7.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than CAOS's 1.10% return.

JULZ

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -4.57%
• YTD: -4.68%
• 6M: -3.09%
• 1Y: 11.99%
• 3Y*: 12.93%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULZ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

JULZ

Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF

CAOS

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

Return for Risk

JULZ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 41
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULZ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JULZ	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.69	+0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	0.97	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	0.83	+0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	1.38	+4.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JULZ vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULZ and CAOS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULZ	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.69	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	1.27	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between JULZ and CAOS is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

JULZ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	12.55%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JULZ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULZ	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.71%	-3.60%	-11.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-3.60%	-5.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.46%	-0.80%	-5.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-0.90%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	2.18%	+0.02%

Volatility

JULZ vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.74%. This indicates that JULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULZ	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	0.74%	+3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	1.30%	+6.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	4.68%	+9.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.18%	4.37%	+7.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.36%	4.37%	+7.99%