JULW vs. APRD
JULW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF) and APRD (Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. JULW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRD.
Performance
JULW vs. APRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JULW
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 12.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- —
APRD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULW vs. APRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JULW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF | 3.24% |
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
JULW vs. APRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JULW
APRD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
JULW
APRD
Financial Services
JULW
APRD
Communication Services
JULW
APRD
Consumer Cyclical
JULW
APRD
Healthcare
JULW
APRD
Industrials
JULW
APRD
Consumer Defensive
JULW
APRD
Energy
JULW
APRD
Utilities
JULW
APRD
Real Estate
JULW
APRD
Basic Materials
JULW
APRD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULW vs. APRD — Risk / Return Rank
JULW
APRD
JULW vs. APRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW) and Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JULW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | — | — |
Drawdowns
JULW vs. APRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULW drawdown since its inception was -9.49%, which is greater than APRD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULW and APRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | 0.00% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | — | — |
Volatility
JULW vs. APRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65% | 0.00% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.88% | 0.00% | +6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 0.00% | +6.54% |
JULW vs. APRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JULW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than APRD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
JULW vs. APRD - Dividend Comparison
Neither JULW nor APRD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JULW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JULW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRD.
JULW and APRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JULW and 0.79% for APRD.
Find the right allocation for JULW and APRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer