JULU vs. MART

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JULU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF) and MART (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JULU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while MART is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JULU returned 20.76% vs 19.48% for MART. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

JULU vs. MART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF (JULU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JULU having a 7.58% return and MART slightly higher at 7.93%.

JULU

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MART

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 19.48%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULU vs. MART - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JULU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF	7.58%	12.19%	5.76%
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF	7.93%	14.93%	6.63%

Correlation

The correlation between JULU and MART is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024	0.93

The correlation between JULU and MART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JULU vs. MART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULU

JULU Risk / Return Rank: 63
JULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
JULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
JULU Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
JULU Martin Ratio Rank: 66

MART

MART Risk / Return Rank: 86
MART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MART Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MART Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MART Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MART Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULU vs. MART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF (JULU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JULU	MART	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.72	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.96	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.56	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	3.69	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.73	20.21	-8.48

JULU vs. MART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULU Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the MART Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULU and MART, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JULU vs. MART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULU drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, which is greater than MART's maximum drawdown of -11.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULU and MART.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULU	MART	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.46%	-11.61%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-5.30%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-0.56%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-0.90%	-1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	0.97%	+0.80%

Volatility

JULU vs. MART - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF (JULU) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) at 2.21%. This indicates that JULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULU	MART	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	2.21%	+2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.31%	5.92%	+2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.40%	7.21%	+3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.64%	9.69%	+1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.64%	9.69%	+1.95%

JULU vs. MART - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JULU and MART have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

JULU vs. MART - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULU nor MART has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JULU and MART in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, JULU and MART move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JULU or MART?

JULU has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to MART (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULU dropped -12.46% vs MART's -11.61%.

Which ETF is better, JULU or MART?

On 1-year performance, JULU leads with 20.76% vs 19.48% for MART. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, MART has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JULU or MART?

Over the 1-year period, JULU has performed better with a 20.76% return vs 19.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULU or MART?

JULU and MART have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULU or MART?

JULU and MART have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JULU and MART?

JULU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MART is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.