JULU vs. AUGT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JULU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF) and AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JULU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while AUGT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JULU returned 19.68% vs 19.09% for AUGT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

JULU vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF (JULU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULU achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than AUGT's 5.63% return.

JULU

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 19.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUGT

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 19.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULU vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JULU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF	6.33%	12.19%	5.59%
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF	5.63%	14.64%	6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JULU and AUGT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.94

The correlation between JULU and AUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JULU vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULU

JULU Risk / Return Rank: 64
JULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JULU Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JULU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AUGT

AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 84
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULU vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF (JULU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JULU	AUGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.55	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.65	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.51	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	3.57	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.55	18.55	-7.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JULU vs. AUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULU Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the AUGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULU and AUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULU	AUGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	2.55	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.53	-0.42

Drawdowns

JULU vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULU drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum AUGT drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULU and AUGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULU	AUGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.46%	-13.12%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-5.36%	-1.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-0.73%	-2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-1.22%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.03%	+0.68%

Volatility

JULU vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETF (JULU) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) at 0.99%. This indicates that JULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULU	AUGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	0.99%	+2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.77%	5.55%	+2.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.03%	7.52%	+2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.52%	10.19%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.52%	10.19%	+1.33%

JULU vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JULU and AUGT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

JULU vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULU nor AUGT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JULU and AUGT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, JULU and AUGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JULU or AUGT?

JULU has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to AUGT (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULU dropped -12.46% vs AUGT's -13.12%.

Which ETF is better, JULU or AUGT?

On 1-year performance, JULU leads with 19.68% vs 19.09% for AUGT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, AUGT has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JULU or AUGT?

Over the 1-year period, JULU has performed better with a 19.68% return vs 19.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULU or AUGT?

JULU and AUGT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULU or AUGT?

JULU and AUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JULU and AUGT?

JULU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AUGT is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.