JULQ vs. LOCT
JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) and LOCT (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
JULQ vs. LOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOCT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ vs. LOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October | 1.81% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULQ vs. LOCT — Risk / Return Rank
JULQ
LOCT
JULQ vs. LOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JULQ | LOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.69 | — |
Drawdowns
JULQ vs. LOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LOCT drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and LOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULQ | LOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.69% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.06% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
JULQ vs. LOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULQ | LOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 2.16% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.60% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.60% | -3.60% |
JULQ vs. LOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JULQ and LOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
JULQ vs. LOCT - Dividend Comparison
JULQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LOCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October | 5.14% | 5.12% | 6.27% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULQ and LOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
LOCT has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 0.00% for JULQ.
Find the right allocation for JULQ and LOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer