JULQ vs. BUFC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) and BUFC (AB Conservative Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. JULQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BUFC.

Performance

JULQ vs. BUFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.28%
• 1Y: 8.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULQ vs. BUFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF	2.14%

JULQ vs. BUFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JULQ	BUFC
Technology	31.7%	33.6%
Financial Services	14.0%	12.5%
Healthcare	10.9%	9.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	10.1%
Communication Services	9.5%	10.5%
Industrials	7.7%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	5.3%
Energy	3.2%	3.4%
Utilities	2.6%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

JULQ vs. BUFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFC

BUFC Risk / Return Rank: 61
BUFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BUFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BUFC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BUFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BUFC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULQ vs. BUFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULQ	BUFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.42	—

Drawdowns

JULQ vs. BUFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BUFC drawdown of -8.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULQ and BUFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULQ	BUFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-8.29%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.76%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JULQ	BUFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	4.25%	-4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	5.64%	-5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	5.64%	-5.64%

JULQ vs. BUFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

JULQ vs. BUFC - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULQ nor BUFC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, JULQ or BUFC?

On fees, BUFC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULQ or BUFC?

BUFC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULQ or BUFC?

JULQ and BUFC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JULQ and BUFC?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULQ and 0.69% for BUFC.