JULJ vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JULJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JULJ returned 5.56% vs 1.88% for CAOS. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. JULJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

JULJ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULJ achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.

JULJ

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULJ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	1.82%	5.91%	6.17%	3.54%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	2.55%	5.33%	2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between JULJ and CAOS is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023	-0.06

The correlation between JULJ and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JULJ vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JULJ	CAOS
Technology	33.6%	33.1%
Financial Services	12.4%	12.4%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	9.5%	9.6%
Industrials	8.5%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	5.4%
Energy	4.0%	4.1%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

JULJ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULJ

JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 96
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULJ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JULJ	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.62	1.24	+2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.05	1.98	+4.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.88	1.26	+0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.21	2.49	+6.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.78	6.22	+41.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JULJ vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULJ and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULJ	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62	1.24	+2.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	1.21	+0.75

Drawdowns

JULJ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULJ drawdown since its inception was -3.62%, roughly equal to the maximum CAOS drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULJ and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULJ	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.62%	-3.60%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.61%	-0.76%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-1.07%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-0.90%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	0.30%	-0.18%

Volatility

JULJ vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) is 0.17%, while Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) has a volatility of 0.26%. This indicates that JULJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULJ	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.17%	0.26%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.94%	1.03%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54%	1.52%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.08%	4.26%	-1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.08%	4.26%	-1.18%

JULJ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

JULJ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

JULJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	5.66%	5.76%	5.96%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JULJ and CAOS in my portfolio?

JULJ and CAOS have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JULJ or CAOS?

CAOS has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to JULJ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULJ dropped -3.62% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

Which ETF is better, JULJ or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, JULJ leads with 5.56% vs 1.88% for CAOS. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JULJ or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, JULJ has performed better with a 5.56% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULJ or CAOS?

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULJ or CAOS?

JULJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between JULJ and CAOS?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULJ and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JULJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.