JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JUKC.L (JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc)) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - JUKC.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while JPLG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JUKC.L returned 14.98%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for JPLG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JUKC.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.

Performance

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) (JUKC.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUKC.L achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.

JUKC.L

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 20.86%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPLG.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 22.95%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JUKC.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc)	6.47%	24.96%	9.72%	7.55%	5.74%
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating	10.77%	10.11%	12.09%	7.05%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between JUKC.L and JPLG.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	0.64

The correlation between JUKC.L and JPLG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUKC.L

JUKC.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
JUKC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
JUKC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JUKC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
JUKC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
JUKC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

JPLG.L

JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) (JUKC.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUKC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.90	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.98	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.52	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	4.09	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	15.27	-7.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUKC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUKC.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUKC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.90	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.69	+0.44

Drawdowns

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUKC.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUKC.L and JPLG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUKC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-27.53%	+14.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-5.59%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.95%	-13.65%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.36%	0.00%	-3.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-3.30%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	1.50%	+1.02%

Volatility

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (acc) (JUKC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that JUKC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUKC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	1.96%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	5.88%	+3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	7.87%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.06%	10.90%	+1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.06%	13.75%	-1.69%

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUKC.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JUKC.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JUKC.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUKC.L and JPLG.L in my portfolio?

JUKC.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JUKC.L or JPLG.L?

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUKC.L or JPLG.L?

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JUKC.L.

What is the main difference between JUKC.L and JPLG.L?

JUKC.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while JPLG.L is Global Equities. JUKC.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JUKC.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.