JSTC vs. FWD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JSTC (Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JSTC returned 12.41%/yr vs 29.50%/yr for FWD. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JSTC charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

JSTC vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSTC achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 20.07% return.

JSTC

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.08%
• 6M: 9.52%
• YTD: 11.63%
• 1Y: 17.52%
• 3Y*: 12.41%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.55%

FWD

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -8.86%
• 6M: 11.18%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 1Y: 39.21%
• 3Y*: 29.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	$39.66M	$42.86M	$36.96M
JSTC Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF	$1.31M	$859.73K	$669.66K

JSTC vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JSTC Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF	11.63%	12.02%	8.96%	13.00%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	20.07%	32.00%	29.23%	23.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JSTC and FWD is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023	0.76

The correlation between JSTC and FWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSTC vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JSTC	FWD
Technology	28.6%	51.2%
Financial Services	23.5%	0.5%
Industrials	18.4%	16.7%
Healthcare	9.8%	8.1%
Communication Services	7.2%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	0.8%
Utilities	2.6%	0.3%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.8%
Energy	0.0%	0.8%

Return for Risk

JSTC vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JSTC

JSTC Risk / Return Rank: 49
JSTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
JSTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
JSTC Omega Ratio Rank: 45
JSTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
JSTC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 51
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JSTC vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JSTC	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.24	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.72	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.78	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	6.86	-0.10

JSTC vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSTC and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JSTC vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSTC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSTC and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	JSTC	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-29.02%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-20.49%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.72%	-29.02%	+12.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-15.78%	+14.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.45%	-4.26%	-2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	5.32%	-2.85%

Volatility

JSTC vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) is 3.81%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 11.37%. This indicates that JSTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JSTC	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	11.37%	-7.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.76%	24.87%	-13.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.12%	29.47%	-15.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	26.00%	-9.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	26.00%	-10.25%

JSTC vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSTC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

JSTC vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

JSTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than FWD's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.09%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JSTC Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF	1.22%	1.34%	1.11%	1.03%	0.83%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JSTC and FWD in my portfolio?

JSTC and FWD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JSTC or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to JSTC (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSTC dropped -26.82% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, JSTC or FWD?

On 3-year performance, FWD leads with 29.50% vs 12.41% for JSTC. On fees, FWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, JSTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JSTC or FWD?

Over the 3-year period, FWD has performed better with a 29.50% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JSTC or FWD?

FWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for JSTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JSTC or FWD?

JSTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.09% for FWD.

What is the main difference between JSTC and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for JSTC and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.