JSMD vs. QTUM
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSMD returned 8.38%/yr vs 29.16%/yr for QTUM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
JSMD vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.56% return.
JSMD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
QTUM
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- 17.45%
- YTD
- 53.56%
- 6M
- 53.19%
- 1Y
- 94.08%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 29.16%
- 10Y*
- —
JSMD vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.55% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -21.67% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.56% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and QTUM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between JSMD and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
QTUM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
JSMD
QTUM
Industrials
JSMD
QTUM
Healthcare
JSMD
QTUM
Financial Services
JSMD
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
QTUM
Basic Materials
JSMD
QTUM
-
Communication Services
JSMD
QTUM
Real Estate
JSMD
QTUM
-
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
QTUM
-
Energy
JSMD
QTUM
-
Utilities
JSMD
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
QTUM
JSMD vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSMD | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.51 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 6.20 | -4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 22.43 | -15.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, roughly equal to the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -38.45% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -15.26% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -25.39% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -38.45% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.42% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -8.24% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.21% | +0.17% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) is 8.24%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that JSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 14.65% | -6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 23.48% | -6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 28.64% | -6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 27.06% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 27.43% | -4.60% |
JSMD vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and QTUM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to JSMD (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.16% vs 8.38% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JSMD has been the lower-risk option at 8.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.16% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.
JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer