PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.56% return.


JSMD

1D
1.27%
1M
6.04%
YTD
19.55%
6M
17.80%
1Y
31.95%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
13.87%

QTUM

1D
4.18%
1M
17.45%
YTD
53.56%
6M
53.19%
1Y
94.08%
3Y*
50.50%
5Y*
29.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
19.55%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-21.67%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.56%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and QTUM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.81

The correlation between JSMD and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSMD vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
QTUM

Technology

28.1%
83.6%

Industrials

23.3%
8.7%

Healthcare

18.7%
0.6%

Financial Services

8.9%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
0.7%

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Communication Services

2.9%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Energy

1.1%

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

JSMD
28.1%
QTUM
83.6%

Industrials

JSMD
23.3%
QTUM
8.7%

Healthcare

JSMD
18.7%
QTUM
0.6%

Financial Services

JSMD
8.9%
QTUM
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
8.7%
QTUM
0.7%

Basic Materials

JSMD
3.0%
QTUM

-

Communication Services

JSMD
2.9%
QTUM
4.8%

Real Estate

JSMD
2.8%
QTUM

-

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
2.5%
QTUM

-

Energy

JSMD
1.1%
QTUM

-

Utilities

JSMD

-

QTUM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

6.20

-4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

22.43

-15.12

JSMD vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, roughly equal to the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-38.45%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-15.26%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-25.39%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-38.45%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-8.24%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.21%

+0.17%

Volatility

JSMD vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) is 8.24%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that JSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

14.65%

-6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

23.48%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.80%

28.64%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.99%

27.06%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

27.43%

-4.60%

JSMD vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.46%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMD and QTUM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to JSMD (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.16% vs 8.38% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JSMD has been the lower-risk option at 8.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.16% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.

JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer