PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. JSML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. JSML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly lower than JSML's 21.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JSMD having a 12.80% annualized return and JSML not far behind at 12.46%.


JSMD

1D
2.28%
1M
-3.09%
6M
10.51%
YTD
16.38%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
13.97%

JSML

1D
1.87%
1M
-2.15%
6M
15.94%
YTD
21.51%
1Y
33.26%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
12.46%
ALL TIME*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.51M$7.19M$7.86M
$2.12M$2.84M$2.20M

JSMD vs. JSML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
16.38%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
21.51%13.41%12.45%30.09%-29.40%3.08%35.38%32.50%-2.53%20.93%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and JSML is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.87

The correlation between JSMD and JSML shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JSMD vs. JSML - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
JSML

Technology

27.7%
26.3%

Industrials

22.1%
22.0%

Healthcare

20.3%
22.8%

Financial Services

9.3%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
7.6%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.6%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.5%

Energy

1.0%
1.8%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

JSMD
27.7%
JSML
26.3%

Industrials

JSMD
22.1%
JSML
22.0%

Healthcare

JSMD
20.3%
JSML
22.8%

Financial Services

JSMD
9.3%
JSML
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
9.0%
JSML
7.6%

Real Estate

JSMD
2.9%
JSML
2.0%

Communication Services

JSMD
2.7%
JSML
1.7%

Basic Materials

JSMD
2.6%
JSML
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
2.4%
JSML
2.5%

Energy

JSMD
1.0%
JSML
1.8%

Utilities

JSMD

-

JSML

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. JSML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JSML
JSML Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSML Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSML Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JSMD vs. JSML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDJSMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.25

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

7.62

-2.90

JSMD vs. JSML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the JSML Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and JSML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. JSML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, roughly equal to the maximum JSML drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and JSML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDJSMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-39.65%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-14.84%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-25.60%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-37.91%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

-39.65%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-4.47%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-10.73%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

4.38%

+0.31%

Volatility

JSMD vs. JSML - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) at 6.24%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JSML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDJSMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

6.24%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.87%

17.68%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

22.73%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.15%

24.53%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.87%

24.30%

-1.43%

JSMD vs. JSML - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JSMD and JSML have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

JSMD vs. JSML - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than JSML's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.61%0.94%1.19%0.49%0.67%0.46%0.30%0.27%0.76%0.42%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JSMD and JSML move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JSMD has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to JSML (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs JSML's -39.65%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 12.80% vs 12.46% for JSML. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, JSML has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSMD and JSML have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

JSML has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JSML is Small Cap Growth Equities. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index.

JSML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and JSML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer