PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. IWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMD has outperformed IWP with an annualized return of 13.27%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.22% annualized return.


JSMD

1D
0.70%
1M
1.65%
YTD
15.35%
6M
12.87%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
13.27%

IWP

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.66%
6M
0.18%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
15.35%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
1.66%8.45%21.86%25.70%-26.90%12.60%35.25%35.04%-4.89%24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and IWP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016

0.87

The correlation between JSMD and IWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSMD vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
IWP

Technology

24.9%
20.0%

Industrials

22.8%
24.2%

Healthcare

18.7%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
21.1%

Financial Services

8.9%
6.9%

Communication Services

3.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.4%

Basic Materials

2.6%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
1.5%

Energy

1.6%
3.8%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

JSMD
24.9%
IWP
20.0%

Industrials

JSMD
22.8%
IWP
24.2%

Healthcare

JSMD
18.7%
IWP
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
9.8%
IWP
21.1%

Financial Services

JSMD
8.9%
IWP
6.9%

Communication Services

JSMD
3.3%
IWP
4.2%

Real Estate

JSMD
2.8%
IWP
1.4%

Basic Materials

JSMD
2.6%
IWP
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
1.8%
IWP
1.5%

Energy

JSMD
1.6%
IWP
3.8%

Utilities

JSMD

-

IWP
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IWP
IWP Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSMDIWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.04

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

0.19

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

0.56

+4.82

JSMD vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSMDIWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.17

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.27

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.42

+0.20

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and IWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDIWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-56.92%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-14.79%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-25.20%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-38.62%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

-38.62%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-4.08%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-9.68%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

5.08%

-0.67%

Volatility

JSMD vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) at 4.62%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDIWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

4.62%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

12.93%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

16.71%

+5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.92%

22.34%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

21.70%

+1.10%

JSMD vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than IWP's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.37%0.40%0.54%0.77%0.30%0.38%0.59%1.02%0.78%1.16%0.98%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.48%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMD and IWP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to IWP (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs IWP's -56.92%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.27% vs 12.22% for IWP. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWP has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.

JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.23% for IWP.

JSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and IWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer