JSMD vs. CGDV
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. JSMD is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JSMD returned 17.18%/yr vs 24.27%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
JSMD vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 10.15% return.
JSMD
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSMD vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 15.35% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -11.15% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and CGDV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between JSMD and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
CGDV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
CGDV
Industrials
JSMD
CGDV
Healthcare
JSMD
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
CGDV
Financial Services
JSMD
CGDV
Communication Services
JSMD
CGDV
Real Estate
JSMD
CGDV
Basic Materials
JSMD
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
CGDV
Energy
JSMD
CGDV
Utilities
JSMD
-
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
CGDV
JSMD vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSMD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.44 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.84 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 13.37 | -7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSMD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.34 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.21 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -21.82% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -9.75% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -14.28% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -2.22% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -3.61% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 2.07% | +2.34% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.60%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 3.60% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 9.47% | +7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 11.85% | +10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 15.51% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 15.51% | +7.29% |
JSMD vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than CGDV's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.48% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and CGDV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 17.18% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 17.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.48% for JSMD.
JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer