PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSGIX vs. JHNBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds III U.S. Growth Fund (JSGIX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSGIX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than JHNBX's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, JSGIX has outperformed JHNBX with an annualized return of 17.57%, while JHNBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


JSGIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
6.02%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.52%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
25.91%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
17.57%

JHNBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.95%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSGIX
John Hancock Funds III U.S. Growth Fund
7.64%20.39%32.38%39.48%-26.61%23.21%29.85%34.79%-0.24%29.27%
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
0.39%7.53%1.97%6.24%-15.22%-0.68%10.31%10.09%-1.15%4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JSGIX and JHNBX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2011

0.02

The correlation between JSGIX and JHNBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSGIX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSGIX
JSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JHNBX
JHNBX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JHNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
JHNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds III U.S. Growth Fund (JSGIX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSGIXJHNBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.50

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.24

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.84

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.77

5.65

+2.12

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the JHNBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSGIX and JHNBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSGIXJHNBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.50

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.02

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.45

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.75

+0.12

Drawdowns

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSGIX drawdown since its inception was -31.80%, which is greater than JHNBX's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSGIX and JHNBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSGIXJHNBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.80%

-24.74%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.58%

-3.25%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.31%

-6.69%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.01%

-20.13%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.80%

-20.13%

-11.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-2.00%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-4.15%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

1.06%

+2.58%

Volatility

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds III U.S. Growth Fund (JSGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) at 1.41%. This indicates that JSGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSGIXJHNBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

1.41%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

2.94%

+8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

3.99%

+11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

5.87%

+15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.04%

4.92%

+16.12%

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSGIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSGIX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison

JSGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than JHNBX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
4.47%4.41%4.14%3.80%2.93%3.30%5.50%3.75%3.51%3.23%3.19%3.48%
JSGIX
John Hancock Funds III U.S. Growth Fund
8.50%9.15%9.61%5.02%11.25%14.04%2.63%0.13%28.16%14.98%4.13%6.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSGIX and JHNBX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSGIX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to JHNBX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSGIX dropped -31.80% vs JHNBX's -24.74%.

JSGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSGIX and JHNBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer