JSCGX vs. UMBHX
JSCGX (Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JSCGX charges 1.97%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
JSCGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JSCGX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- -21.04%
- 6M
- -17.10%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- -8.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JSCGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JSCGX Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.04% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSCGX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSCGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
JSCGX
UMBHX
JSCGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund (JSCGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSCGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSCGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | -20.59 | +20.81 |
Drawdowns
JSCGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSCGX drawdown since its inception was -70.07%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSCGX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSCGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.07% | -1.86% | -68.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.25% | -1.86% | -43.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.08% | -1.26% | -23.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.46% | — | — |
Volatility
JSCGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSCGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.45% | 6.22% | +22.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.09% | 6.22% | +29.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.72% | 6.22% | +26.50% |
JSCGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSCGX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSCGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
Neither JSCGX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSCGX Jacob Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.09% | 13.69% | 2.57% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, JSCGX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for JSCGX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer