JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

JRZE.L (JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc)) and CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - JRZE.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRZE.L returned 15.34%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for CSH.PA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JRZE.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH.PA.

Performance

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc) (JRZE.L) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

JRZE.L is traded in GBp, while CSH.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSH.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRZE.L achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's -0.01% return.

JRZE.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 7.69%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: 19.97%
• 3Y*: 15.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSH.PA

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 6M: -0.55%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: 3.09%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JRZE.L JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc)	7.69%	29.94%	3.35%	17.82%	-10.00%
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	-0.01%	7.72%	-1.02%	1.16%	5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JRZE.L and CSH.PA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2022	0.15

Return for Risk

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRZE.L

JRZE.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
JRZE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
JRZE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
JRZE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
JRZE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
JRZE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CSH.PA

CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 97
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc) (JRZE.L) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JRZE.L	CSH.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.16	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.81	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.21	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	2.37	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	5.18	+1.24

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRZE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRZE.L and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRZE.L drawdown since its inception was -24.05%, smaller than the maximum CSH.PA drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRZE.L and CSH.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRZE.L	CSH.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.05%	-27.56%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-1.96%	-9.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.74%	-3.28%	-9.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-4.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-11.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-1.30%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.29%	-10.49%	+5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	0.90%	+2.22%

Volatility

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc) (JRZE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 1.04%. This indicates that JRZE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRZE.L	CSH.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	1.04%	+2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	2.65%	+9.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.54%	4.01%	+10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	5.37%	+12.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	7.11%	+10.37%

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRZE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JRZE.L vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither JRZE.L nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.05%	2.60%
JRZE.L JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRZE.L and CSH.PA in my portfolio?

JRZE.L and CSH.PA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JRZE.L or CSH.PA?

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRZE.L or CSH.PA?

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRZE.L.

What is the main difference between JRZE.L and CSH.PA?

JRZE.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSH.PA is Money Market. JRZE.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRZE.L and 0.10% for CSH.PA.