PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRUP.L vs. ERND.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JRUP.L) and iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRUP.L is traded in GBP, while ERND.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ERND.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRUP.L achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than ERND.L's 2.19% return.


JRUP.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.77%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
-0.08%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
10Y*

ERND.L

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.96%
6M
1.28%
YTD
2.19%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
2.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JRUP.L
JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
-0.08%7.47%2.11%7.12%-14.19%
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.19%-2.63%7.39%-0.16%14.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JRUP.L and ERND.L is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2022

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRUP.L
JRUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JRUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JRUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ERND.L
ERND.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JRUP.L) and iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRUP.LERND.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.11

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.77

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

2.14

+2.52

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRUP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the ERND.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRUP.L and ERND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRUP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, which is greater than ERND.L's maximum drawdown of -15.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRUP.L and ERND.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRUP.LERND.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-15.45%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-5.14%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-9.61%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-4.19%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-5.98%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.84%

-0.82%

Volatility

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (JRUP.L) is 1.01%, while iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that JRUP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRUP.LERND.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

1.65%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

5.13%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

6.63%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

8.44%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

8.74%

-0.93%

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRUP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ERND.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRUP.L vs. ERND.L - Dividend Comparison

JRUP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.31%4.70%5.54%5.00%1.57%0.49%1.55%2.71%2.19%1.39%0.99%0.72%
JRUP.L
JPM USD IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRUP.L and ERND.L have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERND.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERND.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JRUP.L.

JRUP.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ERND.L is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JRUP.L and 0.09% for ERND.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRUP.L and ERND.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer