JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

JRUD.L (JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JRUD.L is actively managed, while XMVU.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JRUD.L returned 12.63%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for XMVU.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRUD.L achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than XMVU.L's 2.34% return.

JRUD.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.32%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 1Y: 18.19%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 12.63%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.54%

XMVU.L

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: 3.11%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 9.88%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JRUD.L JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	8.45%	16.18%	25.22%	28.37%	-19.11%	30.16%	19.94%	1.36%
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	2.34%	7.93%	15.69%	9.79%	-9.52%	21.61%	4.40%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between JRUD.L and XMVU.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between JRUD.L and XMVU.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JRUD.L	XMVU.L
Technology	39.3%	34.0%
Financial Services	10.9%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	5.5%
Communication Services	10.5%	4.5%
Healthcare	8.2%	13.5%
Industrials	7.8%	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	9.5%
Energy	3.1%	1.4%
Utilities	2.1%	7.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.6%

Return for Risk

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRUD.L

JRUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
JRUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
JRUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
JRUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
JRUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JRUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

XMVU.L

XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JRUD.L	XMVU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	0.59	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	0.87	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.11	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	0.87	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.30	2.66	+6.64

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRUD.L and XMVU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVU.L drawdown of -32.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRUD.L and XMVU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRUD.L	XMVU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-32.98%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	-5.39%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.85%	-9.99%	-8.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.11%	-17.75%	-6.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-2.10%	+0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-3.62%	-1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.76%	+0.26%

Volatility

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison

JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) at 2.48%. This indicates that JRUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRUD.L	XMVU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	2.48%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	5.93%	+3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.94%	7.88%	+4.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.98%	11.60%	+4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.83%	13.01%	+6.82%

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JRUD.L and XMVU.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JRUD.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison

JRUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than XMVU.L's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JRUD.L JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.68%	0.52%	0.50%	0.83%	1.08%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	1.18%	1.24%	1.31%	1.33%	1.82%	1.27%	1.81%	1.55%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRUD.L and XMVU.L in my portfolio?

JRUD.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JRUD.L or XMVU.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRUD.L or XMVU.L?

JRUD.L and XMVU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between JRUD.L and XMVU.L?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Xtrackers.