JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L
JRUD.L (JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FSWD.L (iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - JRUD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FSWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. JRUD.L is actively managed, while FSWD.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JRUD.L returned 12.63%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for FSWD.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JRUD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FSWD.L.
Performance
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JRUD.L is traded in USD, while FSWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JRUD.L achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than FSWD.L's 12.78% return.
JRUD.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 18.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.54%
FSWD.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.16%
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRUD.L JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.45% | 16.18% | 25.22% | 28.37% | -19.11% | 30.16% | 19.94% | 1.36% |
FSWD.L iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.78% | 26.00% | 16.89% | 14.80% | -15.51% | 21.00% | 10.16% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between JRUD.L and FSWD.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between JRUD.L and FSWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Financial Services
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Communication Services
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Healthcare
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Industrials
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Consumer Defensive
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Energy
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Utilities
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Basic Materials
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Real Estate
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
JRUD.L
FSWD.L
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JRUD.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.10 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 12.77 | -3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JRUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum FSWD.L drawdown of -41.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRUD.L and FSWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JRUD.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -41.16% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -7.98% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -18.85% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -25.01% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -0.63% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -12.26% | +6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.94% | +0.08% |
Volatility
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JRUD.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.11% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 9.59% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 12.10% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 20.18% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 18.37% | +1.46% |
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JRUD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FSWD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JRUD.L vs. FSWD.L - Dividend Comparison
JRUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while FSWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSWD.L iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JRUD.L JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.68% | 0.52% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 1.08% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JRUD.L and FSWD.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRUD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRUD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FSWD.L.
JRUD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FSWD.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JRUD.L and 0.30% for FSWD.L.
Find the right allocation for JRUD.L and FSWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer