PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRTYX vs. DRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTYX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JRTYX having a 11.34% return and DRILX slightly lower at 10.90%.


JRTYX

1D
-0.63%
1M
-1.30%
6M
11.34%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*

DRILX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.67%
6M
10.28%
YTD
10.90%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JRTYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
11.34%19.73%15.12%18.25%-18.27%18.19%15.92%24.68%-8.44%-4.63%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
10.90%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between JRTYX and DRILX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2017

0.97

The correlation between JRTYX and DRILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRTYX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRTYX
JRTYX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JRTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JRTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTYX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRTYXDRILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.78

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

11.76

-1.13

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRTYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DRILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRTYX and DRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRTYX drawdown since its inception was -32.54%, roughly equal to the maximum DRILX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRTYX and DRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRTYXDRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.54%

-33.48%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-8.58%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-15.76%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.89%

-23.50%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.32%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-4.21%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.95%

+0.19%

Volatility

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTYX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) at 4.82%. This indicates that JRTYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRTYXDRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

4.82%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

9.70%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

11.84%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.37%

14.95%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

15.68%

+1.60%

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRTYX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRTYX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison

JRTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than DRILX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.82%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%
JRTYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio
2.72%3.02%1.53%1.94%7.22%5.55%3.96%8.47%10.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JRTYX and DRILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRTYX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to DRILX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRTYX dropped -32.54% vs DRILX's -33.48%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRTYX and DRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer