PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRTMX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRTMX achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 12.17% return.


JRTMX

1D
-1.37%
1M
0.06%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.31%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

FCTKX

1D
-2.21%
1M
0.79%
YTD
12.17%
6M
11.46%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JRTMX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
8.03%16.54%11.04%15.26%-17.97%15.75%15.08%10.57%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
12.17%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between JRTMX and FCTKX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2019

0.97

The correlation between JRTMX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRTMX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRTMX
JRTMX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JRTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JRTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRTMXFCTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.94

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

12.83

-0.94

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRTMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRTMX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRTMX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, roughly equal to the maximum FCTKX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRTMX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRTMXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.63%

-30.94%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-9.78%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-15.40%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-27.16%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-2.45%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-5.44%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.23%

-0.59%

Volatility

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX) is 4.04%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that JRTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRTMXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

6.18%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

11.93%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

13.96%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

15.25%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

15.96%

-0.52%

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRTMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRTMX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

JRTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than FCTKX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.22%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%
JRTMX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
2.33%2.52%2.12%2.26%7.16%5.67%4.72%8.45%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JRTMX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTKX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to JRTMX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRTMX dropped -29.63% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRTMX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer