PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRSIX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRSIX achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 22.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JRSIX has underperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.23% annualized return.


JRSIX

1D
1.26%
1M
-0.31%
6M
3.87%
YTD
5.66%
1Y
14.33%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
9.12%

RESGX

1D
1.34%
1M
-0.41%
6M
16.73%
YTD
22.24%
1Y
34.64%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JRSIX
Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund
5.66%13.42%26.89%15.37%-14.15%19.83%12.78%23.51%-3.68%20.55%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
22.24%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JRSIX and RESGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.83

The correlation between JRSIX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRSIX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JRSIX
JRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
JRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
JRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRSIXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

4.06

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

12.85

-7.52

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRSIX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRSIX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRSIXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.71%

-37.80%

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-7.84%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-20.50%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-23.58%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.24%

-37.80%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-4.44%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-4.98%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.50%

-0.19%

Volatility

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund (JRSIX) is 3.33%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that JRSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRSIXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.62%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

11.33%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

14.97%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

17.31%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

18.65%

-1.41%

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRSIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRSIX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

JRSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, more than RESGX's 6.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRSIX
Janus Henderson Adaptive Risk Managed U.S. Equity Fund
9.54%10.08%6.63%3.76%2.56%29.82%12.97%3.25%8.38%6.00%1.48%15.40%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.97%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRSIX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to JRSIX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRSIX dropped -56.71% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRSIX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer