PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRJE.L is traded in GBp, while IJPH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IJPH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRJE.L achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than IJPH.L's 22.24% return.


JRJE.L

1D
0.50%
1M
3.52%
YTD
19.44%
6M
19.65%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10Y*

IJPH.L

1D
0.75%
1M
3.44%
YTD
22.24%
6M
22.61%
1Y
54.54%
3Y*
28.44%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
16.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JRJE.L
JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
19.44%15.91%9.56%13.90%-0.96%
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
22.24%29.37%23.82%34.19%-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JRJE.L and IJPH.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.76

The correlation between JRJE.L and IJPH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JRJE.L
IJPH.L

Industrials

25.0%
24.5%

Technology

19.9%
21.7%

Financial Services

17.6%
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
11.9%

Communication Services

8.2%
8.9%

Healthcare

6.5%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.7%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Energy

1.2%
0.9%

Utilities

1.0%
1.0%

Industrials

JRJE.L
25.0%
IJPH.L
24.5%

Technology

JRJE.L
19.9%
IJPH.L
21.7%

Financial Services

JRJE.L
17.6%
IJPH.L
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JRJE.L
12.5%
IJPH.L
11.9%

Communication Services

JRJE.L
8.2%
IJPH.L
8.9%

Healthcare

JRJE.L
6.5%
IJPH.L
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

JRJE.L
3.5%
IJPH.L
3.3%

Basic Materials

JRJE.L
2.7%
IJPH.L
3.4%

Real Estate

JRJE.L
1.9%
IJPH.L
1.9%

Energy

JRJE.L
1.2%
IJPH.L
0.9%

Utilities

JRJE.L
1.0%
IJPH.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRJE.L
JRJE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JRJE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRJE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRJE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JRJE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRJE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPH.L
IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRJE.LIJPH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

5.63

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

19.56

-7.97

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRJE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRJE.L and IJPH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRJE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRJE.L and IJPH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRJE.LIJPH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.26%

-34.55%

+20.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-9.64%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.26%

-21.95%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-3.19%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-7.45%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

2.78%

+0.58%

Volatility

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRJE.LIJPH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

6.69%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.58%

16.50%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

20.87%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

19.20%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

19.05%

-2.85%

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRJE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JRJE.L nor IJPH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JRJE.L and IJPH.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JRJE.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRJE.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.

JRJE.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRJE.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRJE.L and IJPH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer