JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L
JRJE.L (JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - JRJE.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPH.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRJE.L returned 17.56%/yr vs 28.44%/yr for IJPH.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JRJE.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPH.L.
Performance
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JRJE.L is traded in GBp, while IJPH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IJPH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JRJE.L achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than IJPH.L's 22.24% return.
JRJE.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 39.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJPH.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- 1Y
- 54.54%
- 3Y*
- 28.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.86%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRJE.L JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 19.44% | 15.91% | 9.56% | 13.90% | -0.96% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 22.24% | 29.37% | 23.82% | 34.19% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between JRJE.L and IJPH.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between JRJE.L and IJPH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Technology
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Financial Services
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Cyclical
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Communication Services
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Healthcare
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Defensive
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Basic Materials
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Real Estate
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Energy
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Utilities
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank
JRJE.L
IJPH.L
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JRJE.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.47 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 5.63 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 19.56 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JRJE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRJE.L and IJPH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JRJE.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -34.55% | +20.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -9.64% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.26% | -21.95% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -3.19% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -7.45% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.78% | +0.58% |
Volatility
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRJE.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JRJE.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 6.69% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 16.50% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 20.87% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 19.20% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 19.05% | -2.85% |
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JRJE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
JRJE.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JRJE.L nor IJPH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JRJE.L and IJPH.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRJE.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRJE.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
JRJE.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRJE.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.
Find the right allocation for JRJE.L and IJPH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer