PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRIE.L achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.


JRIE.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.67%
YTD
16.88%
6M
15.92%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
10Y*

JPLG.L

1D
0.01%
1M
2.62%
YTD
10.77%
6M
10.93%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JRIE.L
JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
16.88%14.41%12.30%14.34%4.72%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.77%10.11%12.09%7.05%7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JRIE.L and JPLG.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022

0.19

The correlation between JRIE.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRIE.L
JRIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JRIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRIE.LJPLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.52

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.64

4.09

+12.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.46

15.27

+31.19

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRIE.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.92, which is higher than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRIE.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRIE.LJPLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92

2.90

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.80

0.69

+3.11

Drawdowns

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRIE.L drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, smaller than the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRIE.L and JPLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRIE.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-27.53%

+14.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-5.59%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-13.65%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

0.00%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-3.30%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

Volatility

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that JRIE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRIE.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

1.96%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.53%

7.87%

+26.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.66%

10.90%

+24.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

13.75%

+21.91%

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRIE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRIE.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

JRIE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRIE.L
JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
1.52%1.81%1.53%1.72%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRIE.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRIE.L.

JRIE.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while JPLG.L is Global Equities. JRIE.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRIE.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRIE.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer