PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRGD.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRGD.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than IBCZ.DE's 13.04% return.


JRGD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
4.30%
YTD
10.32%
6M
10.92%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
10Y*

IBCZ.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.84%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.70%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JRGD.DE
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
10.32%6.67%25.38%21.25%-13.07%10.88%
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.04%12.05%24.09%11.45%-10.83%9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between JRGD.DE and IBCZ.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.95

The correlation between JRGD.DE and IBCZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRGD.DE
JRGD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JRGD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRGD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCZ.DE
IBCZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRGD.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRGD.DEIBCZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

5.23

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

20.97

-5.50

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRGD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRGD.DE and IBCZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRGD.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.42

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.69

+0.16

Drawdowns

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRGD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.56%, smaller than the maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRGD.DE and IBCZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRGD.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.56%

-33.99%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-5.29%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.56%

-19.98%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.60%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-4.52%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.32%

+0.15%

Volatility

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRGD.DE) is 2.43%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that JRGD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRGD.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.05%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

8.16%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

11.42%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

14.11%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

15.13%

-0.80%

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRGD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCZ.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRGD.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

JRGD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while IBCZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRGD.DE
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
0.89%0.89%0.91%0.85%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JRGD.DE and IBCZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JRGD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRGD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

JRGD.DE tracks JP Morgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while IBCZ.DE tracks MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRGD.DE and 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRGD.DE and IBCZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer