PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBCZ.DE is traded in EUR, while VFMF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VFMF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCZ.DE achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than VFMF's 16.23% return.


IBCZ.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.92%
YTD
13.22%
6M
14.20%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
11.49%

VFMF

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.78%
YTD
16.23%
6M
16.69%
1Y
30.86%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.22%12.05%24.09%11.45%-10.83%31.27%0.44%24.79%-4.85%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
16.23%3.45%23.23%14.97%0.15%39.78%-3.66%25.11%-3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCZ.DE and VFMF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.58

The correlation between IBCZ.DE and VFMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCZ.DE
IBCZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMF
VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCZ.DEVFMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

5.78

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.11

21.26

-0.15

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the VFMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCZ.DE and VFMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCZ.DEVFMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.33

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.78

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.61

+0.07

Drawdowns

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum VFMF drawdown of -40.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCZ.DE and VFMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCZ.DEVFMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-40.07%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-5.37%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.98%

-24.59%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.98%

-24.59%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.23%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-5.93%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.46%

-0.14%

Volatility

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) at 2.61%. This indicates that IBCZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCZ.DEVFMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.61%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

8.97%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

13.35%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

17.97%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

21.42%

-6.29%

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCZ.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMF's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCZ.DE vs. VFMF - Dividend Comparison

IBCZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.37%1.54%1.60%1.78%2.21%1.39%1.56%1.61%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCZ.DE and VFMF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFMF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFMF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

IBCZ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while VFMF is Multi-factor. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBCZ.DE and 0.18% for VFMF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCZ.DE and VFMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer