PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREU.L vs. BBSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREU.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JREU.L is traded in USD, while BBSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BBSU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREU.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than BBSU.L's 10.04% return.


JREU.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.83%
YTD
9.52%
6M
10.51%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*

BBSU.L

1D
0.12%
1M
4.69%
YTD
10.04%
6M
10.92%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JREU.L
JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.52%16.30%25.12%28.35%-18.91%30.58%19.61%13.23%
BBSU.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.04%17.65%25.07%27.08%-20.03%28.08%19.62%13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JREU.L and BBSU.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.92

The correlation between JREU.L and BBSU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JREU.L
BBSU.L

Technology

35.7%
35.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.1%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.2%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.6%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Technology

JREU.L
35.7%
BBSU.L
35.4%

Financial Services

JREU.L
11.6%
BBSU.L
11.8%

Communication Services

JREU.L
11.1%
BBSU.L
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JREU.L
11.1%
BBSU.L
10.1%

Healthcare

JREU.L
8.6%
BBSU.L
8.6%

Industrials

JREU.L
8.2%
BBSU.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

JREU.L
4.2%
BBSU.L
4.8%

Energy

JREU.L
3.5%
BBSU.L
3.6%

Utilities

JREU.L
2.4%
BBSU.L
2.3%

Real Estate

JREU.L
1.9%
BBSU.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

JREU.L
1.9%
BBSU.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREU.L
JREU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JREU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
JREU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSU.L
BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREU.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREU.LBBSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.98

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.09

12.75

+1.34

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREU.L and BBSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREU.LBBSU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.46

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.84

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.91

-0.02

Drawdowns

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BBSU.L drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREU.L and BBSU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREU.LBBSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-33.73%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-9.14%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.61%

-19.51%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-26.17%

+1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.48%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-5.40%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.14%

-0.25%

Volatility

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) at 2.54%. This indicates that JREU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREU.LBBSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.54%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

8.03%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

11.11%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

15.78%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

17.44%

+0.41%

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JREU.L vs. BBSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREU.L nor BBSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JREU.L and BBSU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JREU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JREU.L and 0.05% for BBSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREU.L and BBSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer