PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREM.DE achieves a 30.82% return, which is significantly higher than QDVS.DE's 17.24% return.


JREM.DE

1D
-1.57%
1M
6.61%
YTD
30.82%
6M
32.74%
1Y
54.32%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*

QDVS.DE

1D
-1.71%
1M
2.65%
YTD
17.24%
6M
18.99%
1Y
35.80%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JREM.DE
JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
30.82%19.77%12.75%4.21%-15.62%4.87%8.43%24.14%-2.66%
QDVS.DE
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF
17.24%16.78%11.26%-2.12%-12.39%6.97%6.67%19.37%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JREM.DE and QDVS.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2018

0.93

The correlation between JREM.DE and QDVS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREM.DE
JREM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVS.DE
QDVS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREM.DEQDVS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.38

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

3.50

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.31

12.67

+6.64

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREM.DE and QDVS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREM.DEQDVS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

2.11

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.29

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.40

+0.16

Drawdowns

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, smaller than the maximum QDVS.DE drawdown of -36.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREM.DE and QDVS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREM.DEQDVS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-36.51%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-10.19%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-20.83%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-25.09%

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-3.00%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-8.82%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.82%

-0.01%

Volatility

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) at 6.00%. This indicates that JREM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREM.DEQDVS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

6.00%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

13.84%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

16.93%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.89%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

18.68%

+0.29%

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JREM.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JREM.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREM.DE nor QDVS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JREM.DE and QDVS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JREM.DE.

JREM.DE tracks JP Morgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JREM.DE and 0.25% for QDVS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREM.DE and QDVS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer