JREG.L vs. TDGB.L
JREG.L (JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - JREG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while TDGB.L tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JREG.L returned 12.10%/yr vs 16.46%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JREG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JREG.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JREG.L achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.65% return.
JREG.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.46%
- 10Y*
- —
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREG.L JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 9.43% | 19.75% | 18.68% | 25.69% | -17.71% | 24.33% | 17.21% | 20.44% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.65% | 40.76% | 8.81% | 14.81% | 9.40% | 18.51% | -2.72% | 14.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between JREG.L and TDGB.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between JREG.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Financial Services
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Industrials
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Communication Services
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Healthcare
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Defensive
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Energy
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Basic Materials
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Utilities
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Real Estate
JREG.L
TDGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
JREG.L
TDGB.L
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JREG.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 5.52 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | 15.71 | -2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JREG.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.53 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.16 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.88 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JREG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREG.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JREG.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -37.43% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -5.06% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.74% | -13.67% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.33% | -18.93% | -6.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.86% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -4.33% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.78% | +0.20% |
Volatility
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that JREG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JREG.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 2.78% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 8.06% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 11.05% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 14.21% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 16.79% | +0.26% |
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
JREG.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
JREG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREG.L JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JREG.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.
JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JREG.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for JREG.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer