PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JREG.DE achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return.


JREG.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
4.29%
YTD
10.36%
6M
11.00%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*

XDEB.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.86%
1Y
-0.08%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JREG.DE
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)
10.36%6.82%25.54%21.37%-13.19%35.15%6.53%32.00%-8.18%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.74%-1.27%17.83%3.66%-4.06%24.01%-6.66%26.17%-3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JREG.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between JREG.DE and XDEB.DE has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JREG.DE
JREG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JREG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JREG.DEXDEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.00

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

-0.02

+3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

-0.03

+15.55

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JREG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JREG.DE and XDEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JREG.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

-0.01

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.61

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.70

+0.18

Drawdowns

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JREG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, which is greater than XDEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREG.DE and XDEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JREG.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.56%

-28.57%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-5.31%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-13.02%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-13.02%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-6.53%

+6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-5.03%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.37%

-0.90%

Volatility

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREG.DE) is 2.46%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that JREG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JREG.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

2.63%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

5.56%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

7.86%

+3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.04%

10.16%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

12.03%

+3.93%

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JREG.DE and XDEB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JREG.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JREG.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JREG.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JREG.DE and XDEB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

JREG.DE tracks JP Morgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JREG.DE and XDEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer