JREC.L vs. CNYA.L
JREC.L (JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CNYA.L (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both China Equities funds. JREC.L is actively managed, while CNYA.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JREC.L returned 9.63%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for CNYA.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JREC.L achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA.L's 0.69% return.
JREC.L
- 1D
- -3.42%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- 25.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA.L
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 20.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- -1.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREC.L JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.55% | 28.38% | 9.65% | -13.02% | -19.50% |
CNYA.L iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.69% | 26.26% | 11.19% | -14.20% | -19.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JREC.L and CNYA.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between JREC.L and CNYA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L — Risk / Return Rank
JREC.L
CNYA.L
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JREC.L) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JREC.L | CNYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 1.83 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 6.53 | +2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JREC.L drawdown since its inception was -37.92%, smaller than the maximum CNYA.L drawdown of -52.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREC.L and CNYA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JREC.L | CNYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.92% | -52.23% | +14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -11.03% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.06% | -27.99% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.46% | -19.75% | +9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.92% | -32.14% | +13.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.10% | -0.26% |
Volatility
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JREC.L) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNYA.L) have volatilities of 9.60% and 9.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JREC.L | CNYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 9.39% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.19% | 15.41% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.20% | 19.65% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 22.95% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 22.92% | +0.16% |
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JREC.L and CNYA.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
JREC.L vs. CNYA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JREC.L nor CNYA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, JREC.L and CNYA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JREC.L and CNYA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares.
Find the right allocation for JREC.L and CNYA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer