JREC.L vs. JU13.L
JREC.L (JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) and JU13.L (JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - JREC.L is a China Equities fund actively managed by ETF Issuer, while JU13.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc). JREC.L is actively managed, while JU13.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JREC.L returned 11.15%/yr vs 4.18%/yr for JU13.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JREC.L vs. JU13.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JREC.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than JU13.L's 0.67% return.
JREC.L
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JU13.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- —
JREC.L vs. JU13.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREC.L JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 9.52% | 28.38% | 9.65% | -13.02% | -19.50% |
JU13.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 0.67% | 5.16% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between JREC.L and JU13.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.04 |
The correlation between JREC.L and JU13.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JREC.L vs. JU13.L — Risk / Return Rank
JREC.L
JU13.L
JREC.L vs. JU13.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREC.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JU13.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JREC.L | JU13.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.54 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 4.22 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.00 | 14.50 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JREC.L vs. JU13.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JREC.L drawdown since its inception was -37.92%, which is greater than JU13.L's maximum drawdown of -5.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREC.L and JU13.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JREC.L | JU13.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.92% | -5.72% | -32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -0.75% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.06% | -0.93% | -26.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -0.04% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -0.96% | -17.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 0.22% | +2.51% |
Volatility
JREC.L vs. JU13.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREC.L) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JU13.L) at 0.38%. This indicates that JREC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JU13.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JREC.L | JU13.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.90% | 0.38% | +8.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 0.90% | +13.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 1.23% | +17.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 2.00% | +21.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 1.68% | +21.34% |
Dividends
JREC.L vs. JU13.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JREC.L nor JU13.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREC.L JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JU13.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 1-3 yr UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JREC.L and JU13.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JREC.L is categorized as China Equities, while JU13.L is Government Bonds.
Find the right allocation for JREC.L and JU13.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer