JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE
JREA.DE (JPMorgan AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - JREA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while CBUF.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JREA.DE returned 20.04%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CBUF.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JREA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CBUF.DE.
Performance
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JREA.DE achieves a 30.23% return, which is significantly higher than CBUF.DE's -2.22% return.
JREA.DE
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 30.23%
- 6M
- 30.94%
- 1Y
- 49.01%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JREA.DE JPMorgan AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 30.23% | 14.97% | 15.52% | 0.94% | -9.63% |
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.33% | 13.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between JREA.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
JREA.DE
CBUF.DE
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREA.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JREA.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.10 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 0.68 | +4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 1.56 | +17.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JREA.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 0.53 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.44 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JREA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.14%, smaller than the maximum CBUF.DE drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JREA.DE and CBUF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JREA.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.14% | -25.94% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -10.87% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -21.76% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -9.66% | +6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -5.65% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.74% | -2.07% |
Volatility
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JREA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) at 4.98%. This indicates that JREA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JREA.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 4.98% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 9.70% | +4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 13.98% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 13.60% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 15.36% | +1.50% |
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JREA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUF.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
JREA.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison
JREA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
JREA.DE JPMorgan AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JREA.DE and CBUF.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JREA.DE.
JREA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CBUF.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. JREA.DE tracks JP Morgan AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG), while CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JREA.DE and 0.18% for CBUF.DE.
Find the right allocation for JREA.DE and CBUF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer