JRE vs. JLQD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JRE (Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF) and JLQD (Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JRE is a fund fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while JLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index. JRE is actively managed, while JLQD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRE returned 10.22%/yr vs 5.64%/yr for JLQD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JRE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JLQD.

Performance

JRE vs. JLQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRE achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than JLQD's 0.33% return.

JRE

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 6M: 12.26%
• 1Y: 15.89%
• 3Y*: 10.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JLQD

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.31%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 5.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRE vs. JLQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JRE Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF	13.17%	2.97%	7.65%	8.79%	-23.47%	9.52%
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	0.33%	7.77%	3.21%	8.76%	-15.99%	-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JRE and JLQD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021	0.41

JRE vs. JLQD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JRE	JLQD
Real Estate	95.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	2.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JRE vs. JLQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRE

JRE Risk / Return Rank: 38
JRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
JRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
JRE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JRE Martin Ratio Rank: 43

JLQD

JLQD Risk / Return Rank: 43
JLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
JLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
JLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
JLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
JLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRE vs. JLQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRE	JLQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.48	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.19	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	1.98	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	6.88	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRE vs. JLQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the JLQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRE and JLQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRE	JLQD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.48	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.02	+0.19

Drawdowns

JRE vs. JLQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRE drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, which is greater than JLQD's maximum drawdown of -21.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRE and JLQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRE	JLQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.69%	-21.17%	-10.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-2.87%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-6.84%	-11.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.51%	-0.89%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.62%	-8.76%	-3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	0.82%	+1.48%

Volatility

JRE vs. JLQD - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) at 1.24%. This indicates that JRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRE	JLQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	1.24%	+3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	2.78%	+6.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	3.88%	+9.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	6.31%	+12.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	6.31%	+12.40%

JRE vs. JLQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JLQD's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRE vs. JLQD - Dividend Comparison

JRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than JLQD's 5.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	5.44%	5.28%	5.36%	3.99%	2.77%	0.83%
JRE Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF	4.99%	5.81%	2.20%	2.77%	2.87%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRE and JLQD in my portfolio?

JRE and JLQD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JRE or JLQD?

JRE has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to JLQD (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRE dropped -31.69% vs JLQD's -21.17%.

Which ETF is better, JRE or JLQD?

On 3-year performance, JRE leads with 10.22% vs 5.64% for JLQD. On fees, JLQD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JLQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JRE or JLQD?

Over the 3-year period, JRE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRE or JLQD?

JLQD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JRE or JLQD?

JLQD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 4.99% for JRE.

What is the main difference between JRE and JLQD?

Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JRE and 0.20% for JLQD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.