JRE vs. JEMB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JRE (Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF) and JEMB (Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JRE is a fund fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while JEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JRE returned 15.89% vs 12.99% for JEMB. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JRE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for JEMB.

Performance

JRE vs. JEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRE achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than JEMB's 2.72% return.

JRE

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 6M: 12.26%
• 1Y: 15.89%
• 3Y*: 10.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JEMB

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 2.72%
• 6M: 3.66%
• 1Y: 12.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRE vs. JEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JRE Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF	13.17%	2.97%	-0.11%
JEMB Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	2.72%	14.63%	1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JRE and JEMB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024	0.34

Return for Risk

JRE vs. JEMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRE

JRE Risk / Return Rank: 38
JRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
JRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
JRE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JRE Martin Ratio Rank: 43

JEMB

JEMB Risk / Return Rank: 54
JEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
JEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
JEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 53
JEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
JEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRE vs. JEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRE	JEMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.64	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.36	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	2.79	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	11.47	-4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRE vs. JEMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the JEMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRE and JEMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRE	JEMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.64	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	1.25	-1.03

Drawdowns

JRE vs. JEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRE drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, which is greater than JEMB's maximum drawdown of -5.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRE and JEMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRE	JEMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.69%	-5.37%	-26.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-4.67%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.51%	-0.42%	-2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.62%	-1.01%	-11.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.14%	+1.16%

Volatility

JRE vs. JEMB - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) at 2.38%. This indicates that JRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRE	JEMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	2.38%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	6.35%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	7.98%	+5.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	8.51%	+10.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	8.51%	+10.20%

JRE vs. JEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JEMB's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRE vs. JEMB - Dividend Comparison

JRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than JEMB's 6.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JEMB Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	6.27%	6.19%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JRE Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF	4.99%	5.81%	2.20%	2.77%	2.87%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRE and JEMB in my portfolio?

JRE and JEMB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JRE or JEMB?

JRE has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to JEMB (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRE dropped -31.69% vs JEMB's -5.37%.

Which ETF is better, JRE or JEMB?

On 1-year performance, JRE leads with 15.89% vs 12.99% for JEMB. On fees, JEMB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, JEMB has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JRE or JEMB?

Over the 1-year period, JRE has performed better with a 15.89% return vs 12.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRE or JEMB?

JEMB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JRE or JEMB?

JEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 4.99% for JRE.

What is the main difference between JRE and JEMB?

Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JRE and 0.52% for JEMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.