JRE vs. FAAR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JRE (Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JRE is a fund fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JRE returned 4.96%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. JRE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.

Performance

JRE vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRE achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly higher than FAAR's 18.01% return.

JRE

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 19.19%
• 6M: 18.57%
• 1Y: 23.68%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: —

FAAR

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -5.18%
• YTD: 18.01%
• 6M: 17.71%
• 1Y: 28.64%
• 3Y*: 10.16%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRE vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JRE Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF	19.19%	2.97%	7.65%	8.79%	-23.47%	16.20%
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	18.01%	8.07%	5.97%	-5.63%	10.15%	2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between JRE and FAAR is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021	-0.02

Return for Risk

JRE vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRE

JRE Risk / Return Rank: 63
JRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JRE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
JRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
JRE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FAAR

FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 79
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRE vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JRE	FAAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.18	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	3.12	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.37	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	3.76	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.63	14.47	-3.84

JRE vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRE and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JRE vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRE drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRE and FAAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRE	FAAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.69%	-18.03%	-13.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-7.66%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-11.54%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.69%	-18.03%	-13.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.18%	+7.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.48%	-7.82%	-4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	1.98%	+0.25%

Volatility

JRE vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.85%. This indicates that JRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRE	FAAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	2.85%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.29%	9.79%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.84%	13.22%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	12.97%	+5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	11.54%	+7.18%

JRE vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRE vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

JRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, less than FAAR's 10.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	10.25%	11.63%	3.45%	3.20%	5.82%	6.49%	3.05%	1.02%	0.58%	2.83%
JRE Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF	4.74%	5.81%	2.20%	2.77%	2.87%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRE and FAAR in my portfolio?

JRE and FAAR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JRE or FAAR?

JRE has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to FAAR (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRE dropped -31.69% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

Which ETF is better, JRE or FAAR?

On 5-year performance, FAAR leads with 7.61% vs 4.96% for JRE. On fees, JRE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JRE or FAAR?

Over the 5-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 7.61% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRE or FAAR?

JRE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JRE or FAAR?

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 10.25%, compared with 4.74% for JRE.

What is the main difference between JRE and FAAR?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JRE and 0.95% for FAAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.