PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRDG.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRDG.L achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.


JRDG.L

1D
0.17%
1M
3.34%
YTD
9.68%
6M
9.54%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.77%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JRDG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
9.68%11.47%20.63%18.78%-7.76%7.99%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%22.49%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between JRDG.L and TDGB.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.59

The correlation between JRDG.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JRDG.L
TDGB.L

Technology

28.6%
0.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
31.7%

Industrials

11.3%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
3.8%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.7%

Healthcare

8.9%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
10.1%

Energy

4.2%
19.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.2%

Utilities

2.9%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.0%

Technology

JRDG.L
28.6%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Financial Services

JRDG.L
15.4%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Industrials

JRDG.L
11.3%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JRDG.L
10.1%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Communication Services

JRDG.L
9.1%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Healthcare

JRDG.L
8.9%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

JRDG.L
4.6%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Energy

JRDG.L
4.2%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Basic Materials

JRDG.L
3.2%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Utilities

JRDG.L
2.9%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Real Estate

JRDG.L
1.7%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRDG.L
JRDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRDG.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.59

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

6.26

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.26

20.72

-4.45

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRDG.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRDG.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

3.15

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.98

-0.04

Drawdowns

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRDG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRDG.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRDG.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-29.60%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-4.66%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-12.41%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.47%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-3.70%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.41%

+0.20%

Volatility

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDG.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) have volatilities of 2.43% and 2.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRDG.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.49%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

7.01%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

9.28%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

11.42%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

14.44%

-1.01%

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRDG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRDG.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

JRDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
JRDG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
1.03%0.99%1.01%0.94%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRDG.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JRDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

JRDG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JRDG.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRDG.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer