JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JRCE.L (JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and CNAL.L (Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, from JPMorgan and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JRCE.L returned 9.28%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for CNAL.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JRCE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAL.L.

Performance

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRCE.L achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than CNAL.L's 8.97% return.

JRCE.L

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 14.07%
• 1Y: 41.49%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAL.L

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 12.11%
• 1Y: 37.56%
• 3Y*: 7.96%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JRCE.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)	10.74%	19.75%	11.38%	-17.74%	-9.39%
CNAL.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR	8.97%	16.96%	16.16%	-18.82%	-12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between JRCE.L and CNAL.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022	0.53

Over the past year, JRCE.L and CNAL.L have become more correlated (0.98) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRCE.L

JRCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
JRCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
JRCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
JRCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
JRCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
JRCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CNAL.L

CNAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
CNAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CNAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CNAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CNAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRCE.L	CNAL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.41	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	3.24	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.43	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.45	5.41	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.93	15.33	+3.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRCE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the CNAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRCE.L and CNAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRCE.L	CNAL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.41	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.33	-0.22

Drawdowns

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRCE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum CNAL.L drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRCE.L and CNAL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRCE.L	CNAL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.68%	-44.83%	+8.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.40%	-6.91%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.42%	-26.58%	+1.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.19%	-11.26%	+9.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-21.39%	+3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.44%	-0.25%

Volatility

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L) have volatilities of 5.57% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRCE.L	CNAL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	5.51%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	10.58%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.11%	15.52%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.50%	31.33%	-9.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.50%	40.07%	-18.57%

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRCE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CNAL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRCE.L vs. CNAL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JRCE.L nor CNAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRCE.L and CNAL.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, JRCE.L and CNAL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, JRCE.L or CNAL.L?

On fees, CNAL.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JRCE.L or CNAL.L?

CNAL.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JRCE.L.

What is the main difference between JRCE.L and CNAL.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JRCE.L and 0.35% for CNAL.L.