PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L) and JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRBU.L is traded in GBP, while JPGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JPGL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRBU.L achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than JPGL.L's 10.85% return.


JRBU.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.53%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.24%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
2.58%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*

JPGL.L

1D
0.63%
1M
3.06%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JRBU.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.63%0.49%3.98%2.31%-5.58%-0.42%5.50%-1.09%
JPGL.L
JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.85%9.80%12.27%7.60%0.48%24.47%3.06%-0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between JRBU.L and JPGL.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.16

The correlation between JRBU.L and JPGL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRBU.L
JRBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
JRBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

JPGL.L
JPGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L) and JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRBU.LJPGL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.99

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

15.49

-11.76

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRBU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the JPGL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRBU.L and JPGL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRBU.LJPGL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.39

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.84

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.64

-0.41

Drawdowns

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRBU.L drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, smaller than the maximum JPGL.L drawdown of -28.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRBU.L and JPGL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRBU.LJPGL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-28.18%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-5.75%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.72%

-13.93%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.81%

-13.93%

+1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.87%

0.00%

-5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-3.37%

-4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.48%

+0.38%

Volatility

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L) is 1.52%, while JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that JRBU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPGL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRBU.LJPGL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

2.80%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

7.48%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

9.58%

-3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.01%

12.31%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

15.03%

-5.21%

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JRBU.L and JPGL.L have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRBU.L vs. JPGL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JRBU.L nor JPGL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JRBU.L and JPGL.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRBU.L and JPGL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

JRBU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JPGL.L is Global Equities. JRBU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while JPGL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRBU.L and JPGL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer