PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRBU.L achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than ERNU.L's 1.86% return.


JRBU.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.53%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.24%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
2.58%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*

ERNU.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.30%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
2.46%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
3.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JRBU.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.63%0.49%3.98%2.31%-5.58%-0.42%5.50%10.97%-0.12%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.86%-2.45%7.39%-0.34%13.45%1.52%-2.17%-0.16%-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between JRBU.L and ERNU.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2018

0.67

The correlation between JRBU.L and ERNU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRBU.L
JRBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
JRBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRBU.LERNU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.21

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

3.09

+0.64

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRBU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRBU.L and ERNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRBU.LERNU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.83

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.58

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.42

-0.19

Drawdowns

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRBU.L drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, which is greater than ERNU.L's maximum drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRBU.L and ERNU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRBU.LERNU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-14.92%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-4.43%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.72%

-9.54%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.81%

-14.92%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.87%

-4.01%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-5.80%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.74%

+0.12%

Volatility

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L) is 1.52%, while iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that JRBU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRBU.LERNU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

2.03%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

4.72%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

6.46%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.01%

8.36%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

9.34%

+0.48%

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRBU.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNU.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRBU.L vs. ERNU.L - Dividend Comparison

JRBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERNU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
5.69%4.68%5.45%5.00%1.55%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%
JRBU.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRBU.L and ERNU.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JRBU.L.

JRBU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JRBU.L and 0.09% for ERNU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRBU.L and ERNU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer