PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQUA vs. JPST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQUA vs. JPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.34% return.


JQUA

1D
-2.82%
1M
3.22%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.62%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*

JPST

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JQUA vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
10.93%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.34%4.99%5.58%5.13%1.14%0.11%2.18%3.34%2.23%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and JPST is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.09

The correlation between JQUA and JPST shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JQUA vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JQUA
JPST

Technology

41.9%
1.8%

Financial Services

10.2%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
2.5%

Industrials

7.6%
2.1%

Healthcare

7.2%
1.5%

Communication Services

5.5%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
0.7%

Energy

3.2%
0.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.7%

Basic Materials

0.8%
0.2%

Technology

JQUA
41.9%
JPST
1.8%

Financial Services

JQUA
10.2%
JPST
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JQUA
9.2%
JPST
2.5%

Industrials

JQUA
7.6%
JPST
2.1%

Healthcare

JQUA
7.2%
JPST
1.5%

Communication Services

JQUA
5.5%
JPST
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

JQUA
5.3%
JPST
0.7%

Energy

JQUA
3.2%
JPST
0.4%

Utilities

JQUA
2.3%
JPST
2.8%

Real Estate

JQUA
2.1%
JPST
0.7%

Basic Materials

JQUA
0.8%
JPST
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQUA vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JPST
JPST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JQUA vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JQUAJPSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

3.90

-2.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

28.74

-25.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

141.65

-130.13

JQUA vs. JPST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the JPST Sharpe Ratio of 8.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and JPST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JQUAJPSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

8.02

-6.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

6.28

-5.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

3.19

-2.38

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and JPST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQUAJPSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-3.28%

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-0.15%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-0.30%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-0.79%

-21.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-0.08%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-0.08%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

0.03%

+1.67%

Volatility

JQUA vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQUAJPSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

0.15%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

0.36%

+8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

0.54%

+11.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

0.58%

+15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

0.93%

+17.08%

JQUA vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JQUA vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than JPST's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.26%4.43%5.16%4.79%1.83%0.73%1.43%2.69%2.07%0.96%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.10%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


JQUA and JPST have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JQUA has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs JPST's -3.28%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.27% vs 3.60% for JPST. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPST.

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.

JQUA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.18% for JPST.

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.02 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQUA and JPST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer