JQUA vs. FDVV
JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index while FDVV tracks the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JQUA returned 13.33%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
JQUA vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 7.59% return.
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FDVV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 11.39% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -2.98% | 5.07% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 7.59% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and FDVV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between JQUA and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JQUA vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JQUA
FDVV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
JQUA
FDVV
Financial Services
JQUA
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
JQUA
FDVV
Industrials
JQUA
FDVV
Healthcare
JQUA
FDVV
Communication Services
JQUA
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
JQUA
FDVV
Energy
JQUA
FDVV
-
Utilities
JQUA
FDVV
Real Estate
JQUA
FDVV
Basic Materials
JQUA
FDVV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQUA vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
JQUA
FDVV
JQUA vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JQUA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 2.41 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 10.00 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JQUA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.23 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.90 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.79 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQUA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -40.25% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -9.30% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -15.90% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | -20.18% | -2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -1.85% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -3.80% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.24% | -0.53% |
Volatility
JQUA vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 2.96%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQUA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 2.96% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 8.08% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 10.07% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 14.75% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 16.99% | +1.02% |
JQUA vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
JQUA vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FDVV's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.74% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.10% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JQUA and FDVV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to FDVV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.33% vs 13.25% for FDVV. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.
JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQUA and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer