PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQC vs. FKYTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQC vs. FKYTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) and Nuveen Kentucky Municipal Bond Fund (FKYTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQC achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than FKYTX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, JQC has outperformed FKYTX with an annualized return of 5.86%, while FKYTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.63% annualized return.


JQC

1D
0.21%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.46%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
5.86%

FKYTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.27%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JQC vs. FKYTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
1.57%-0.36%22.29%15.26%-14.22%13.29%-2.96%21.78%-4.33%-0.27%
FKYTX
Nuveen Kentucky Municipal Bond Fund
0.79%3.34%1.09%6.57%-10.85%2.24%4.24%7.35%0.75%4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between JQC and FKYTX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2003

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQC vs. FKYTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQC
JQC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FKYTX
FKYTX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FKYTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKYTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKYTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FKYTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKYTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JQC vs. FKYTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) and Nuveen Kentucky Municipal Bond Fund (FKYTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JQCFKYTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

2.19

-1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.56

3.38

-2.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.52

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

2.25

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.94

7.15

-6.21

JQC vs. FKYTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQC Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the FKYTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQC and FKYTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JQCFKYTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

2.19

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.03

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.39

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.15

-0.92

Drawdowns

JQC vs. FKYTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, which is greater than FKYTX's maximum drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQC and FKYTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQCFKYTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.18%

-15.24%

-59.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-3.19%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.37%

-7.34%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-15.24%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.99%

-15.24%

-32.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-0.95%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-1.91%

-6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

1.00%

+4.02%

Volatility

JQC vs. FKYTX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) has a higher volatility of 2.16% compared to Nuveen Kentucky Municipal Bond Fund (FKYTX) at 1.22%. This indicates that JQC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKYTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQCFKYTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

1.22%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

2.28%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

3.23%

+7.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

4.54%

+8.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

4.23%

+13.33%

JQC vs. FKYTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQC has a 4.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FKYTX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

JQC vs. FKYTX - Dividend Comparison

JQC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.11%, more than FKYTX's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKYTX
Nuveen Kentucky Municipal Bond Fund
2.93%3.02%2.70%2.63%2.72%2.58%2.58%2.98%3.17%3.52%3.73%3.61%
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
13.11%12.91%11.39%11.42%9.71%10.03%16.11%16.14%6.53%7.42%6.99%7.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


JQC and FKYTX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JQC has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to FKYTX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQC dropped -75.18% vs FKYTX's -15.24%.

FKYTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQC and FKYTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer