PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPY vs. FLJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPY vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Japanese Equity ETF (JPY) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPY achieves a 17.35% return, which is significantly higher than FLJP's 14.80% return.


JPY

1D
-0.99%
1M
0.13%
6M
11.59%
YTD
17.35%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
45.86%

FLJP

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.06%
6M
8.11%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$34.44M$45.56M$43.61M
$117.81K$120.64K$196.88K

JPY vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JPY
Lazard Japanese Equity ETF
17.35%39.95%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
14.80%36.99%

Correlation

The correlation between JPY and FLJP is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.95

The correlation between JPY and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPY vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPY
JPY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPY vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Japanese Equity ETF (JPY) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPYFLJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.27

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

7.59

-0.06

JPY vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPY and FLJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPY vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPY drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPY and FLJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPYFLJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-32.49%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-13.30%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-4.24%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-9.25%

+6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

3.98%

+0.48%

Volatility

JPY vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Japanese Equity ETF (JPY) is 6.16%, while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that JPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPYFLJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

7.24%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

16.93%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

20.04%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

18.12%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

17.94%

+3.08%

JPY vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPY vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

JPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FLJP's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.29%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%
JPY
Lazard Japanese Equity ETF
1.18%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JPY and FLJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLJP has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to JPY (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPY dropped -15.13% vs FLJP's -32.49%.

On 1-year performance, JPY leads with 32.90% vs 29.28% for FLJP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, JPY has been the lower-risk option at 6.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPY has performed better with a 32.90% return vs 29.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JPY.

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.18% for JPY.

They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JPY and 0.09% for FLJP.

JPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPY and FLJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer