PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPXN vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPXN vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPXN achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -19.62% return. Over the past 10 years, JPXN has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 9.33%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


JPXN

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.59%
YTD
14.58%
6M
14.15%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
9.33%

SLV

1D
-7.09%
1M
-24.25%
YTD
-19.62%
6M
-20.61%
1Y
58.79%
3Y*
36.01%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPXN vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
14.58%26.03%6.48%19.69%-16.29%0.16%15.12%19.40%-14.87%24.41%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-19.62%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JPXN and SLV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.23

The correlation between JPXN and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPXN vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPXN
JPXN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPXN vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPXNSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.16

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

2.66

+5.34

JPXN vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPXN and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPXN vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPXN drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPXN and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPXNSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-76.28%

+20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-50.97%

+37.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

-50.97%

+37.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.21%

-50.97%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.21%

-50.97%

+17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-50.97%

+47.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-44.66%

+29.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

22.14%

-18.33%

Volatility

JPXN vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) is 6.89%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that JPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPXNSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

15.67%

-8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

59.65%

-43.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

60.78%

-41.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

36.73%

-18.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

32.16%

-15.12%

JPXN vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPXN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPXN vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

JPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
2.79%3.14%2.29%2.57%1.47%2.63%1.27%1.92%1.60%1.50%2.07%1.32%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPXN and SLV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to JPXN (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPXN dropped -55.54% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 11.85% vs 9.33% for JPXN. On fees, JPXN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, JPXN has been the lower-risk option at 6.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPXN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

JPXN has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

JPXN is categorized as Japan Equities, while SLV is Silver. JPXN tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for JPXN and 0.50% for SLV.

JPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPXN and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer