JPUS vs. ROCQ
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while ROCQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JPUS is passively managed, while ROCQ is actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ROCQ.
Performance
JPUS vs. ROCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JPUS
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.18%
ROCQ
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $730.62K | $1.08M | $1.02M | |
| $13.13M | $10.74M | $11.66M |
JPUS vs. ROCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 10.67% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 15.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and ROCQ is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. ROCQ — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
ROCQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JPUS vs. ROCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPUS | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. ROCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than ROCQ's maximum drawdown of -8.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and ROCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -8.05% | -30.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -3.02% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -1.58% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | — | — |
Volatility
JPUS vs. ROCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 19.99% | -9.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 19.99% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 19.99% | -3.27% |
JPUS vs. ROCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ROCQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPUS vs. ROCQ - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than ROCQ's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 1.96% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 4.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and ROCQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ROCQ.
ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 1.96% for JPUS.
JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ROCQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.35% for ROCQ.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and ROCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer